06 September, 2013

Lies Your World Map Told You: 5 Ways You're Being Misled

Unfortunately, most world political maps aren't telling you the whole story. The idea that the earth's land is cleanly divvied up into nation-states - one country for each of the world's peoples - is more an imaginative ideal than a reality. Read on to learn about five ways your map is lying to you about borders, territories, and even the roster of the world's countries.

Map of the world's countries according to the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency
The lines and coloring on this map are hiding major truths about the world's countries.
(Source: U.S. CIA; public domain)
1) Missing Countries
When choosing what counts as a country, most world maps go by either the official list from their own country or the member/observer roster from the United Nations. Just one problem: there are about ten countries which have declared and enforced their independence, but aren't recognized by the U.N. or most of the world's governments. These states may have close ties to a neighbor country, but most of them aren't at all controlled by the country they're supposed to be part of.

Map showing Abkhazia and South Ossetia, two breakaway states claimed by Georgia.
Abkhazia and South Ossetia operate as independent countries, but are claimed by Georgia and only recognized by a few countries. Map by Ssolbergj (CC BY-SA).
There are some high-profile special cases that warrant at least a note on many maps. Taiwan's government formally claims to represent non-communist China, though it acts more like a separate country. Palestine, another disputed state, is now recognized as a U.N. observer country despite being forced to share control of its territory with Israel.

Western Sahara's status is considered unresolved by the U.N., and a small piece is effectively independent; meanwhile, Northern Cyprus is recognized only by its patron country, Turkey. The self-proclaimed Republic of Kosovo is now recognized by half of the U.N.'s members but not by the U.N. itself.

Other countries escape entirely from all but the most careful of political maps, being misleadingly merged into the countries that claim their territories: Abkhazia and South Ossetia into Georgia, Nagorno-Karabakh into Azerbaijan, and Transnistria into Moldova. These four breakaway states are sponsored by neighboring countries, but the most left out of all is Somaliland, which receives no major support or recognition from anyone, despite managing its affairs completely independently from Somalia.

Unrecognized Countries: More Articles and Maps

2) Incomplete Control
Drawing lines around a country on the map might imply that its government controls all the land within those lines. But that's often not the case in reality. Even setting aside foreign military occupations like the recent U.S. interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan, many countries' governments don't control their whole territories. Aside from the cases of breakaway states as described earlier, this mainly occurs in war zones where rebel groups are actively vying for control of all or part of the country.

Map of government and Al Shabaab control in Somalia's ongoing civil war
Large parts of Somalia are controlled by Al Shabaab extremists. Click for map attribution info (CC BY-SA).
Somalia is probably the most infamous for this. Its U.N.-recognized government controls around half the country at best, and a few years ago controlled nothing but a part of the capital city! The rest is divided between the religious extremist Al Shabaab and various autonomous states which keep their own counsel on whether to cooperate with the government.

The territories of Mali, Nigeria, the Central African Republic, Libya, and Ivory Coast have all only recently been reunited (either under the former government or under the rebels), and Syria is the current model of a state falling apart through violence. Other countries with rebels firmly controlling parts of their territory are Yemen, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Myanmar/Burma.

Divided Countries: More Articles and Maps

3) Undefined Borders
Map of the border dispute recently resolved between Niger and Burkina Faso
Niger and Burkina Faso recently resolved an unclear border situation. Map by Evan Centanni (click for details; CC BY-SA).
Another thing political maps imply is that borders at least have strictly defined locations in principle, even if they're usually invisible on the ground. If they weren't well-defined, they wouldn't all be drawn with solid lines on the map, right? Wrong. Many countries have borders that have never been precisely defined by treaties, a process called "delimitation".

Even fewer have been actually "demarcated", or marked on the ground. In fact, undefined borders are such a big issue among the relatively young countries of Africa that the African Union operates an official border program to encourage the ongoing delimitation of national boundaries.

The fudge factor in national borders isn't always big enough to make a difference to where they're drawn on the world map - but their fuzziness can sometimes have major effects on international relations. An undefined border is a ripe environment for the birth of territorial disputes when neighboring countries have different ideas of where the border should run.

Sometimes these disputes are only low-level disagreements, such as the one recently resolved between Niger and Burkina Faso; but in other places like the border between Sudan and South Sudan, they can escalate into bloody conflicts.

Undefined Borders: More Articles and Maps

4) Disputed Territories
Your world map may label a few well-known territorial disputes, caused either by vague borders or conflicts over island groups. You might then reasonably conclude that disagreements over who owns a place, though they do happen, are relatively few and far between. Unfortunately, your conclusion would be incorrect. There are far more disputed territories in the world than you've probably ever imagined.

Map of the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands, controlled by Japan but claimed by China and Taiwan
Map of the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands, disputed between Japan, China, and Taiwan (map by Evan Centanni).
The most bizarre disputes range from high-profile cases, such as the five-way feud over the Spratly Islands, to quieter anomalies like Bir Tawil between Sudan and Egypt, both of whom claim it belongs to the other.

You may have heard of those, but did you know that (at least on paper) Mongolia is claimed by Taiwan? Or that more than half of Guyana is claimed by Venezuela? What about the several territories disputed between the U.S. and Canada? And those are just the land disputes - wait until you hear about the oceans!

Disputed Territories: More Articles and Maps

5) Territorial Seas
One thing completely left off of most maps is ownership of the sea. The occasional border lines you see across straits on your map are just showing who owns the islands on either side, not who owns the sea in between. The uninterrupted expanse of blue on most maps then might imply that the seas are the domain of no country. This is true for parts of the open ocean far from any coastline - but closer in, countries can and do exercise territorial rights over their neighboring seas. According to international best practices, a country is entitled to extend its territory up to 12 nautical miles (NM) out from its coastline, regulate economic activity out to 200 NM, and sometimes control seafloor oil and mineral exploration out to much further.

Map of territorial seas and exclusive economic zones (EEZ) around the Falkland Islands (Malvinas), controlled by the U.K. but claimed by Argentina
Both the land and the seas of the Falkland Islands are disputed between the U.K. and Argentina. Map by Evan Centanni (click for details; CC BY-SA).
But the divvying up of the world's seas is still an ongoing process, and there are probably even more maritime disputes than land-based ones. Some countries, like Peru and Ecuador, refuse to recognize the 12 NM limit, claiming sovereign territory out to a full 200 NM. In even more cases, neighboring countries just can't agree on where to draw the border between their respective territorial seas.

International law does provide guidance on how to divide it up, but for now many countries make claims far beyond what seems reasonable, apparently hoping they have something extra to give away in future negotiations. The most extreme claims, like China's infamous "Nine-dotted Line" around most of the South China Sea, don't seem to follow much legal logic at all.

Maritime Jurisdiction: More Articles and Maps

So next time you find yourself looking at a political map of the world, remember to be critical and take those borders with a grain of salt!

Other Articles You Might Like:
5 Countries You've Never Heard Of (by Their Native Names) 
How Many Countries Are There in the World?
Parade of Nations: Which Countries Are (and Aren't) in the Olympics?


  1. About the claim of Mongolia by Taiwan (Republic of China): it is only on paper-level constitutional definition of border, in practice Taiwan recognizes independence of Mongolia. http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2002/10/11/0000175237 is a source from 2002 about it.

    1. For the most part. But it's not quite dead yet:

      Lawmakers voice worries over ties with Mongolia

      And it was definitely real within recent memory, even though it's largely faded now. There are still older books and wall maps in circulation from a couple decades ago that clearly show Mongolia as part of the Republic of China.

    2. I actually no later than 2 weeks ago saw an official map of the Republic of China (including the whole Mongolian territory) that was sold in some bookstore (for around NTD50) in the underground passage between Songshan and Taipei Main station. Printed in 2012 if I remember well. It's surely faded in the minds of most of the Taiwanese... Though, to find this map in the middle of other world maps/taiwan maps/taipei maps, was a big surprise for me!

      Also, quite interesting to see world maps printed in Taiwan (on the same bookshelf as this official ROC map), with a big 中國大陸 (China Mainland) instead of writting "PRC", and a small 中華民囯 (ROC) on the island of Taiwan, which was colored differently! How schizophrene

    3. Thanks for the report, Ben! That is a bit surprising that there are still new maps with the old ROC borders. There is a certain percentage of people in Taiwan (and especially Taipei) whose families came over after the civil war and still are very loyal to their identity as Chinese nationals of the ROC, so maybe there are some who resist letting go of the old borders despite the necessary pragmatism of current government policy (I suspect that's also the phenomenon behind the issue in the article I linked to above).

  2. check this link on other curiosities of spanish legal possesions in teh Pacific: http://tendencias.vozpopuli.com/cultura/1277-aun-tenemos-imperio-asi-son-las-islas-espanolas-del-pacifico

    1. Interesting! I didn't know about this case before. For those who don't read Spanish, here's a paragraph about it on the English Wikipedia:


  3. This is a GREAT site! Love the detailed maps that come with the NEUTRAL analyses.
    Bravo and keep it going!

  4. Sadly a world map is too small scale to show almost any of these except for the largest. It would be better to say this about regional maps and even some of this stuff is too small for these larger scale maps.

  5. "Other countries escape entirely from all but the most careful of political maps, being misleadingly merged into the countries that claim their territories: Abkhazia and South Ossetia into Georgia, Nagorno-Karabakh into Azerbaijan, and Transnistria into Moldova." This is like saying it is misleading that my claim to own your house is not recognized in city property registry. There's a meaning to the word "country", and none of the territories you list come close to meeting that definition. Indeed, it is extremely misleading of you to claim otherwise, so much so that one has to question why you would make such a claim.

    1. There are many different meanings of the word "country". What's you're definition, and why don't these places meet it?

      Are you aware that all of those places are completely outside the control of the countries that claim them? In Abkhazia there are no Georgian police, no Georgian government offices, no Georgian taxes, nothing. That's the point I'm trying to make. It's more like if you claim the house where I live, but I don't pay rent and I don't let you come over. We can't bring in the city property registry or the police, because there's no world government that has the authority to say who owns what.

      In fact, many of today's countries (such as the U.S.) were created in exactly the same way as Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Transnistria, etc. Differences in diplomatic recognition certainly matter for certain purposes, but I think the average reader is more interested in the actual situation on the ground.

    2. Evan, love the site and love the maps. One suggestion in future can you CAPITALIZE THE WORD "EARTH" as "Earth" instead of lowercasing it as "earth"? earth is the dirt we walk on or grow gardens in, but the Earth is our home planet. for example here ......Lies Your World Map Told You: 5 Ways You're Being Misled
      Unfortunately, most world political maps aren't telling you the whole story. The idea that the earth's ....CHANGE TO "the Earth's land".......land is cleanly divvied up into nation-states - one country for each of the world's peoples - is more an imaginative ideal than a reality. Read on to learn about five ways your map is lying to you about borders, territories, and even the roster of the world's countries. AGREE OR DISAGREE.?